Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.6 to 19.2.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderTencentAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.232.2
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12701210

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12641208

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12741208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1248—

Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12621160
LMArena Chinese13191192
LMArena Russian12581187

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12451186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13011194

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12741218
LMArena Creative Writing12421199
LMArena Multi-Turn12751221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper