Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 16.5.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.