Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 31.8.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1488 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1483 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1473 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1483 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.