Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Hy4 preview
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 8.7.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hy4 preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2026-08-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.25 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1632 |
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Hy4 preview leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 75% |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Hy4 preview?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Hy4 preview better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Hy4 preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.