Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 40.1 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1487 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1474 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1467 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.