Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 31.6 to 10.2.
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1028 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1089 |
Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1023 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 996 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.8 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.