Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 24.8 to 8.1.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1210 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1208 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | — |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.