Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.3 to 15.3.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1210 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1208 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Too close to call
Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.