Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 7.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.8% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 88.9% for Muse Spark.
  • DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Muse Spark specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BMuse Spark
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index24.950.6
Released2023-11-292026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1527

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMuse Spark
LMArena Coding10961481
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts10701474
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5152.04
CritPt—11.3%
Chess Puzzles0%—

Math Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMuse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%88.9%
LMArena Math11081455
ProofBench—17%
MATH Level 56.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMuse Spark
GPQA Diamond24.6%89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1457

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English10731464
LMArena Chinese11321509
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1466
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following10791442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query10921451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BMuse Spark
LMArena Text11051474
LMArena Creative Writing10671459
LMArena Multi-Turn10821477

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Muse Spark share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper