Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark leads 66.0 to 13.8.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Muse Spark specifications
Llama 13bMuse Spark
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index24.450.6
Released2023-02-242026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2127

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark
LMArena Coding6831481
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts7281474
Epoch Capabilities Index100.58152.04
CritPt—11.3%
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math Muse Spark leads

Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark
LMArena Math8381455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1457
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English8191464
LMArena Chinese—1509
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1466
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following7811442

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMuse Spark
LMArena Text8341474
LMArena Creative Writing7941459
LMArena Multi-Turn7531477

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Muse Spark share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper