Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Hy4 preview
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 10.2.
- Hy4 preview has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Hy4 preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-08-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.25 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1632 |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.2% |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 75% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Hy4 preview?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Hy4 preview better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Hy4 preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.