Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.1 to 7.1.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1389 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1399 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1384 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1375 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.