Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 36.0 to 9.6.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1389 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1384 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.