Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.1 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.8% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 71.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2026-07-21 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1453 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1440 |
| SciCode | — | 41.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 39% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 765.27 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 29.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 10% |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1441 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | 145.13 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 10.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 53.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 83.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
Math Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | 71.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1433 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 26% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| ProofBench | — | 13% |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1435 |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1268 |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1427 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1469 |
| LMArena French | — | 1451 |
| LMArena German | — | 1454 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1443 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1442 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1420 |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1435 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1435 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1420 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1445 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1559 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39.