Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b has enough public results to be ranked (#245); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 33B leads 37.4 to 30.9.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 33B leads
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 95.74 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b has enough public results to be ranked (#245); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.