Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Gemma 2 2b IT
Gemma 2 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#244); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 33B leads 37.4 to 31.8.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 2 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 33B leads
DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180), Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 95.74 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1135 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1096 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1140 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1118 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1130 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1118 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Gemma 2 2b IT?
Gemma 2 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#244); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Gemma 2 2b IT share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.