Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Wizardlm 70b

Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

69.0

Rank #2 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads 89.6 to 32.2.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index69.033.0
Released2026-09-01—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$50—
Results tracked5212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Fable 5.1 leads

Claude Fable 5.1: 74.7 (#1), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding15281081
FrontierCode50.9%—
CursorBench51.8%—
LMArena WebDev1744—
FrontierSWE56.3%—
SciCode63.1%—
GSO88.2%—
WeirdML92.9%—
MirrorCode73.3%—
ALE-Bench2,143—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 50.7 (#5), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
APEX-Agents68.6%—
Remote Labor Index17.9%—
GDP.pdf29.6%—
Vending-Bench 25,422—

Reasoning Claude Fable 5.1 leads

Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#7), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts15261079
ARC-AGI-290%—
NYT Connections (extended)90%—
ARC-AGI-197.5%—
CritPt31.1%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
EBR-Bench57.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles58%—
DTBench97.6%—
LMCA65.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index164.7—

Math Claude Fable 5.1 leads

Claude Fable 5.1: 89.6 (#4), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math15251116
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)90.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 487.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
FrontierMath Erdős0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 69.6 (#6), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
Humanity's Last Exam46.5%—
SimpleQA Verified70.8%—
LMArena Expert1535—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 53.9 (#4), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1318—
Blueprint-Bench 241.9%—
Furniture Assembly70%—
LMArena Document1513—

Multilingual Claude Fable 5.1 leads

Claude Fable 5.1: 59.1 (#3), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English15071078
LMArena Chinese15861052
LMArena German15001083
LMArena Russian15211155
LMArena French1525—
LMArena Japanese1543—
LMArena Korean1534—
LMArena Spanish1516—

Instruction Following Claude Fable 5.1 leads

Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#6), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following15171093

Long Context Claude Fable 5.1 leads

Claude Fable 5.1: 46.7 (#20), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query15221097

Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5.1 leads

Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#2), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text15101120
LMArena Creative Writing15071149
LMArena Multi-Turn14921108
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2162—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 74.7 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5.1 and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper