Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Qwen1.5-7B

Qwen1.5-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#273); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.9

Unranked Sparse

Qwen1.5-7B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #273 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 33B leads 38.0 to 32.2.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33BQwen1.5-7B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.931.4
Released2023-11-022024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked913

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek Coder 33B leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen1.5-7B
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LMArena Coding—1107
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Hard Prompts—1065
Epoch Capabilities Index96.32—
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Math—1080
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen1.5-7B
MMLU39.4%62.6%
LMArena Expert—1055
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Non-English—1058
LMArena Chinese—1141
LMArena Russian—1006

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Instruction Following—1058

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Longer Query—1090

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Text—1083
LMArena Creative Writing—1035
LMArena Multi-Turn—1062

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Qwen1.5-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#273); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Qwen1.5-7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper