Model comparison
Command R vs DeepSeek Coder 33B
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#272); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek Coder 33B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 33B leads 38.0 to 29.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 45.2% for Command R and 51.1% for DeepSeek Coder 33B.
Side by side
| Command R | DeepSeek Coder 33B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 38.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 33B leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184)
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | 42% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | 51.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 75% |
| MBPP+ | — | 70.1% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command R: 13.8 (#331), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 96.32 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 62% |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 28.0 (#246), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 35.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 39.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.7 (#245), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.1 (#261), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.2 (#254), DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 33B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than DeepSeek Coder 33B?
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#272); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Command R or DeepSeek Coder 33B better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and DeepSeek Coder 33B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9.