Model comparison
DBRX vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 33.7.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DBRX: 32.3 (#262), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1488 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DBRX: 20.5 (#218), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1483 |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DBRX: 22.3 (#265), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1473 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#289), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DBRX: 29.4 (#263), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DBRX: 57.7 (#265), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#253), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#271), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.