Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 34.9.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
GPT-4Qwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.145.3
Released2023-03-14—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window8K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$30—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked3817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding12541487
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3.5 Max Preview
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts12411483
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math12691474
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert12111489
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English12461465
LMArena Chinese12421534
LMArena French12831484
LMArena German12511487
LMArena Japanese12091495
LMArena Korean11841438
LMArena Russian12511471
LMArena Spanish12611470

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following12411467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query12441476

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text12631470
LMArena Creative Writing12441464
LMArena Multi-Turn12571478
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper