Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 10.8.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
GPT-4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderOpenAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.132.7
Released2023-03-14—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window8K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$30—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked3816

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12541210
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12411208
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12691208
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1211—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual GPT-4 leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12461160
LMArena Chinese12421192
LMArena Russian12511187
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following GPT-4 leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12411186
IFEval—78%

Long Context GPT-4 leads

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12441194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12631218
LMArena Creative Writing12441199
LMArena Multi-Turn12571221
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper