Model comparison
DBRX vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 33.7.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.42 |
Math Not comparable
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge o3-pro leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference o3-pro leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and o3-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.