Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs o3-pro

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.9

Rank #105 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and o3-pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 38.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 19.2% for Claude 3 Opus and 58.2% for o3-pro.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and o3-pro specifications
Claude 3 Opuso3-pro
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index29.542.9
Released2024-02-292025-06-10
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$20
Output $ / M tokens—$80
Results tracked4612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Opuso3-pro
WeirdML19.2%58.2%
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), o3-pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Opuso3-pro
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning o3-pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Opuso3-pro
DTBench61.6%86.9%
LMCA17%38.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91147.42
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
SimpleBench23.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.1%
ARC-AGI-1—59.3%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1245—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Opuso3-pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
LMArena Math1273—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge o3-pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Opuso3-pro
Confabulations22.7%14.2%
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.3%
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), o3-pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Opuso3-pro
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), o3-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Opuso3-pro
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), o3-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Opuso3-pro
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context o3-pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Opuso3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench—97.2%
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference o3-pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 Opuso3-pro
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than o3-pro?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and o3-pro share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper