Model comparison
DBRX vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1 leads 41.5 to 14.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for DBRX and 94.7% for o1.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 40.6 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
DBRX: 32.3 (#262), o1: 45.7 (#64)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1367 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | 80.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DBRX: —, o1: 24.3 (#111)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
DBRX: 20.5 (#218), o1: 27.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1372 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.92 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math o1 leads
DBRX: 22.3 (#265), o1: 34.9 (#150)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1388 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge o1 leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#289), o1: 41.5 (#101)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 76.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1362 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, o1: 33.6 (#87)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
DBRX: 29.4 (#263), o1: 48.8 (#137)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1394 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | 1343 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
DBRX: 57.7 (#265), o1: 75.0 (#82)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1368 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#253), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#271), o1: 55.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | DBRX | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1368 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.7 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and o1 share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.