Model comparison

DBRX vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.4

Rank #311 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 33.6.
  • DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DBRX and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 specifications
DBRXHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderDatabricksTencent
Noometry Index29.441.3
Released2024-03-27—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2116

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding11321361
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts11131374

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math11451359
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert10761339
GPQA Diamond32.9%—

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English10711363
LMArena Chinese10681417
LMArena French10961391
LMArena German10571355
LMArena Japanese9901342
LMArena Korean9931351
LMArena Russian10781368
LMArena Spanish1064—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following11121344

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query11121366

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text11191377
LMArena Creative Writing11041359
LMArena Multi-Turn11111387

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is DBRX or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper