Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.6 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1367 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | 80.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1371 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 141.91 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math o1 leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1361 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1356 |
| LMArena French | — | 1344 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and o1 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.