Model comparison
DBRX vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 32.9.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DBRX: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Not comparable
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.