Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.2 to 30.4.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 32.8 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 105.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | — |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | — |
| LMArena French | 1043 | — |
| LMArena German | 1009 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1086 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1046 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1085 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-13B or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.