Model comparison

DBRX vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.4

Rank #311 Confirmed

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.3 to 33.6.

Side by side

DBRX and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) specifications
DBRXKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
ProviderDatabricksMoonshot AI
Noometry Index29.441.2
Released2024-03-272025-07-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.57
Output $ / M tokens—$2.30
Results tracked2142

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Coding11321399
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—63.4%
Aider Polyglot—59.1%
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—42.8%
ALE-Bench—597.5
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DBRX: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Terminal-Bench—35.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—59.1%
METR Time Horizons—59.2%

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Hard Prompts11131384
SimpleBench—26.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—64.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.01
ForecastBench—60.2

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Math11451397
Omni-MATH—65.4%
MATH Level 511.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Expert10761365
GPQA Diamond32.9%—
MMLU-Pro—81.9%
Confabulations—20.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.9%
GPQA (HELM)—65.3%

Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Non-English10711372
LMArena Chinese10681415
LMArena French10961379
LMArena German10571387
LMArena Japanese9901349
LMArena Korean9931325
LMArena Russian10781385
LMArena Spanish10641386

Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Instruction Following11121348
IFEval—85%

Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Longer Query11121353
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—17.6%

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Text11191380
LMArena Creative Writing11041350
LMArena Multi-Turn11111371
Short-Story Creative Writing—85.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1666
WildBench—86.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is DBRX or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper