Model comparison

DBRX vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.4

Rank #311 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 33.6.
  • DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DBRX and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 specifications
DBRXHunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderDatabricksTencent
Noometry Index29.443.1
Released2024-03-27—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding11321418
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts11131416

Math Not comparable

DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Math1145—
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Vision 1.5
GPQA Diamond32.9%—
LMArena Expert1076—

Multimodal Not comparable

DBRX: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision—1180

Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English10711382
LMArena Chinese1068—
LMArena French1096—
LMArena German1057—
LMArena Japanese990—
LMArena Korean993—
LMArena Russian1078—
LMArena Spanish1064—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following11121397

Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query11121404

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text11191405
LMArena Creative Writing11041388
LMArena Multi-Turn11111422

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is DBRX or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper