Noometry

Model comparison

DBRX vs GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.4

Rank #311 Confirmed

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.8

Rank #180 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 1 category and GLM-4.7-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 35.5 to 14.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 60.5% for GLM-4.7-Flash.

Side by side

DBRXGLM-4.7-Flash
ProviderDatabricksZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index29.438.8
Released2024-03-272026-01-19
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.06
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked2121

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads

DBRX: 32.9 (#266), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)

BenchmarkDBRXGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Coding11321383
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Reasoning Too close to call

DBRX: 21.4 (#222), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)

BenchmarkDBRXGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11131356
Chess Puzzles—0%

Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads

DBRX: 24.3 (#269), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)

BenchmarkDBRXGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Math11451355
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—58.3%
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge GLM-4.7-Flash leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#294), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)

BenchmarkDBRXGLM-4.7-Flash
GPQA Diamond32.9%60.5%
LMArena Expert10761357
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%

Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads

DBRX: 29.3 (#268), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)

BenchmarkDBRXGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Non-English10711330
LMArena Chinese10681403
LMArena French10961332
LMArena German10571337
LMArena Korean9931283
LMArena Russian10781332
LMArena Spanish10641350
LMArena Japanese990—

Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads

DBRX: 57.5 (#270), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)

BenchmarkDBRXGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11121327

Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#258), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)

BenchmarkDBRXGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Longer Query11121345

Writing & Preference GLM-4.7-Flash leads

DBRX: 33.6 (#275), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)

BenchmarkDBRXGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Text11191351
LMArena Creative Writing11041297
LMArena Multi-Turn11111342
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1125

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is DBRX or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper