Noometry

Model comparison

DBRX vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.0

Rank #307 Confirmed

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.8

Rank #113 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.0 to 14.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 83.3% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
  • DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderDatabricksGoogle
Noometry Index29.041.8
Released2024-03-272026-07-21
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked2138

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

DBRX: 32.3 (#262), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96)

BenchmarkDBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Coding11321455
LMArena WebDev—1440
SciCode—41.3%
WeirdML—39%
ALE-Bench—765.27
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DBRX: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82)

BenchmarkDBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GDP.pdf—10%

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

DBRX: 20.5 (#218), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95)

BenchmarkDBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts11131441
ARC-AGI-2—10.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—60.4%
ARC-AGI-1—53.5%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—22%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—83.5%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.12

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

DBRX: 22.3 (#265), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245)

BenchmarkDBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Math11451431
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—26%
FrontierMath Tier 4—0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—13%
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#289), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66)

BenchmarkDBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPQA Diamond32.9%83.3%
LMArena Expert10761430

Multimodal Not comparable

DBRX: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38)

BenchmarkDBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision—1266

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

DBRX: 29.4 (#263), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59)

BenchmarkDBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Non-English10711428
LMArena Chinese10681467
LMArena French10951452
LMArena German10571454
LMArena Japanese9901428
LMArena Korean9931406
LMArena Russian10781443
LMArena Spanish10641440

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

DBRX: 57.7 (#265), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77)

BenchmarkDBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Instruction Following11121420

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#253), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80)

BenchmarkDBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Longer Query11121435

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#271), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55)

BenchmarkDBRXGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text11191436
LMArena Creative Writing11041419
LMArena Multi-Turn11111445
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1559

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DBRX or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper