Model comparison
DBRX vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 33.6.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1390 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1399 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1414 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1374 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.