Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 2B
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 2B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.2 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 39 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1010 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 989 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 94.2 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1009 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 937 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 970 |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 981 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 987 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 945 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Gemma 2B?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Gemma 2B better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Gemma 2B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.