Model comparison
Command R vs Wizardlm 13b
Command R and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 4 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command R leads 35.7 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Command R | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1018 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1017 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Command R leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1048 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Command R leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Wizardlm 13b?
Command R and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Command R or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.3 vs 30.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.