Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen1.5-7B and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-7B scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | 1035 |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1065 | 1018 |
Math Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | — |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1141 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | 1048 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1083 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen1.5-7B and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Qwen1.5-7B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen1.5-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.