Model comparison
Command R vs Phi-3.5-mini
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#267); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Phi-3.5-mini in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Phi-3.5-mini leads 34.0 to 28.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 45.2% for Command R and 38.5% for Phi-3.5-mini.
Side by side
| Command R | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | 38.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#267); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Command R or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Phi-3.5-mini share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.