Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Phi-3.5-mini
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#268); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Phi-3.5-mini leads 34.6 to 29.9.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 36.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#268); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.