Model comparison
Command R vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 25.2 to 13.8.
Side by side
| Command R | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1291 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1272 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1305 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1295 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1247 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1252 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.