Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Command R
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 8 categories and Command R in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 23.3 to 13.8.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command R | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | 2024-08-30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | 4K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), Command R: 29.3 (#306)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 17.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 45.2% |
Reasoning C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), Command R: 13.8 (#331)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | 1164 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 21.9% |
| DTBench | — | 46.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 33.3% |
| LMCA | — | 9.2% |
| LiveBench | — | 27.5% |
Math C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), Command R: 28.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | 1155 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 19.4% |
Knowledge C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), Command R: 31.0 (#221)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | 1138 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| MMLU | — | 65.2% |
Multilingual C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), Command R: 35.7 (#245)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | 1174 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | 1182 |
| LMArena French | 1248 | 1162 |
| LMArena German | 1199 | 1176 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | 1143 |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | 1163 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1174 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | 1151 |
Instruction Following C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), Command R: 58.1 (#261)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | 1167 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 55.6% |
Long Context Too close to call
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), Command R: 36.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | 1198 |
Writing & Preference C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), Command R: 38.2 (#254)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | 1187 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | 1170 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1163 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 16.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Command R?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or Command R better for coding?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.8 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 128K tokens.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Command R share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Command R has 29.