Noometry

Model comparison

Command R vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 38.2.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command RMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index31.448.5
Released2024-08-302026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$0.28
Results tracked2919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R: 29.3 (#306), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding11691504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11641482
CritPt—12%
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R: 28.0 (#246), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math11551468
ProofBench—63%
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R: 31.0 (#221), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert11381501
MMLU65.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R: 35.7 (#245), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English11741434
LMArena Chinese11821511
LMArena French11621475
LMArena Russian11741409
LMArena Spanish11511456
LMArena German1176—
LMArena Japanese1143—
LMArena Korean1163—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11671463
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R: 36.3 (#231), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query11981463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text11871455
LMArena Creative Writing11701400
LMArena Multi-Turn11631451
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Is Command R or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper