Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 31.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index31.648.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding11121504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10921482
CritPt—12%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math11431468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert10871501

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English10371434
LMArena Chinese10631511
LMArena Russian10601409
LMArena French—1475
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10881463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query11221463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text10961455
LMArena Creative Writing10711400
LMArena Multi-Turn10631451

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper