Model comparison
Command R vs Laguna M.1
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Laguna M.1 leads 23.1 to 13.8.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Command R | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 4K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Command R | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1349 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Command R | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Command R leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Command R | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Laguna M.1?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.