Model comparison
Command R vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 38.2.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1418 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1416 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1397 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1422 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.