Noometry

Model comparison

Command R vs Seed 2.0 Pro

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Seed 2.0 Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 38.2.
  • Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command RSeed 2.0 Pro
ProviderCohereByteDance Seed
Noometry Index31.443.2
Released2024-08-302026-02-14
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K256K
Max output4K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$3
Results tracked2920

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R: 29.3 (#306), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)

BenchmarkCommand RSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Coding11691472
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)

BenchmarkCommand RSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts11641453
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
Thematic Generalization—57.1%
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R: 28.0 (#246), Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)

BenchmarkCommand RSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Math11551439
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R: 31.0 (#221), Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)

BenchmarkCommand RSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Expert11381440
MMLU65.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)

BenchmarkCommand RSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Vision—1274

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R: 35.7 (#245), Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)

BenchmarkCommand RSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English11741441
LMArena Chinese11821489
LMArena French11621471
LMArena German11761442
LMArena Japanese11431408
LMArena Korean11631411
LMArena Russian11741449
LMArena Spanish11511460

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)

BenchmarkCommand RSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following11671414
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R: 36.3 (#231), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)

BenchmarkCommand RSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Longer Query11981428

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)

BenchmarkCommand RSeed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Text11871448
LMArena Creative Writing11701406
LMArena Multi-Turn11631441
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Seed 2.0 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Command R or Seed 2.0 Pro?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Command R or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Seed 2.0 Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper