Model comparison
Command R vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
TencentSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 38.2.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1361 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1374 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1339 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1344 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1387 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.