Model comparison
Command R vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 25.0 to 13.8.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1270 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1264 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1274 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1248 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1245 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.