Model comparison
Command R vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 43.4 to 13.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 87.7% for Grok 4.1 Fast.
- Both cost about the same: $0.15 input and $0.60 output per million tokens.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 41.4 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-06-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | 4K | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1411 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1242 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 394.93 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)
| Benchmark | Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,107 |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)
| Benchmark | Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1407 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 87.7% |
| SimpleBench | — | 56% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)
| Benchmark | Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1399 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.8% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1201 |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)
| Benchmark | Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1415 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1413 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1376 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1390 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)
| Benchmark | Command R | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1327 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command R or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.1 Fast lists at $0.20 and $0.50.
Is Command R or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?
Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 128K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Grok 4.1 Fast share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.