Model comparison

Command R vs GPT-5 Pro

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 157× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.0

Rank #267 Confirmed

GPT-5 Pro OpenAI

46.2

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 39.2 to 13.3.
  • Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
  • GPT-5 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R and GPT-5 Pro specifications
Command RGPT-5 Pro
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Noometry Index31.046.2
Released2024-08-302025-10-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K400K
Max output4K272K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$15
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$120
Results tracked2912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5 Pro leads

Command R: 28.8 (#301), GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGPT-5 Pro
WeirdML—60.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
LMArena Coding1170—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—
AlgoTune—1.31

Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads

Command R: 13.3 (#329), GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGPT-5 Pro
ARC-AGI-2—18.3%
SimpleBench—61.6%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—76.8%
ARC-AGI-1—70.2%
EnigmaEval—18.8%
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1164—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.26
LiveBench27.5%—

Math GPT-5 Pro leads

Command R: 25.8 (#244), GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGPT-5 Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—55.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—19.5%
LiveBench Math19.4%—
LMArena Math1155—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads

Command R: 30.5 (#219), GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGPT-5 Pro
Humanity's Last Exam—31.6%
LMArena Expert1138—
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R: 35.9 (#240), GPT-5 Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGPT-5 Pro
LMArena Non-English1174—
LMArena Chinese1182—
LMArena French1161—
LMArena German1176—
LMArena Japanese1143—
LMArena Korean1162—
LMArena Russian1174—
LMArena Spanish1150—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R: 58.3 (#256), GPT-5 Pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGPT-5 Pro
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1167—

Long Context Not comparable

Command R: 36.3 (#226), GPT-5 Pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGPT-5 Pro
LMArena Longer Query1198—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R: 38.4 (#248), GPT-5 Pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RGPT-5 Pro
LMArena Text1187—
LMArena Creative Writing1170—
LMArena Multi-Turn1163—
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than GPT-5 Pro?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 157× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Command R or GPT-5 Pro?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.

Is Command R or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?

GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R and GPT-5 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper